Deepfake Porn Is Now a Crime. AI Girls Are Not.

The new § 191a (introduced by amendment no. 270/2025 Sb.) criminalizes producing, offering, making publicly accessible, distributing or selling pornographic material (photo, film, computer-generated or otherwise) that 'depicts or otherwise exploits a person who did not consent to it'. That 'otherwise exploits' wording is aimed squarely at deepfakes: gluing a real person's face onto a generated body is covered even though the body isn't theirs. The base penalty is up to two years; spreading it over the internet, causing significant harm, or doing it for profit raises it to six months–three years; organized, cross-border or large-scale cases carry one to five years.

Two details people miss: production alone is enough. The fake nude sitting in your gallery, never posted, is already the offense once it was made without consent. And a second new provision (§ 181 para. 2) covers non-pornographic deepfakes made to seriously harm someone, so the 'it's satire, not porn' escape hatch is closed too.

Every tool whose workflow starts with 'upload a photo' now puts its Czech users one click from a criminal record. And Czechia is the direction of travel, not an outlier: the EU directive on combating violence against women (2024/1385) requires all member states to criminalize non-consensual intimate deepfakes by June 2027, and similar laws already exist from the UK to several US states. The tools themselves live offshore and vanish when payment processors drop them; the legal risk stays with the user who made the image.

It's worth saying plainly: this is the law working as it should. A fake nude of a classmate, a colleague or an ex is abuse of a real human being, and the fact that an AI drew the pixels changes nothing about the harm. Any platform that treats that as a feature is building on borrowed time. Which is exactly why we never did.

§ 191a protects the identity of a person who didn't consent. An AI companion has no such person behind her: her face was never anyone's face, her body never anyone's body. There is no identity to misuse and no victim to harm. Explicit images of a woman who exists only as a character are outside what the offense is built to punish, in Czechia and everywhere else these laws are appearing, because the entire point of the law is the real human being.

DreamBabe enforces that boundary structurally, not with a policy page: there is no upload button anywhere on the platform. The undress and edit features only work on photos your own AI companion sent in your chat, her appearance is a locked character profile, and every companion is a fully invented adult. You couldn't commit § 191a with our editor if you tried. Which is precisely why the feature can be uncensored, on a regular card-payment platform, with nothing to hide.

Never upload a photo of a real person to any undressing or face-swap NSFW tool. Not your crush, not your ex, not a celebrity, not 'just for yourself'. Production without consent is the crime; the internet upgrade to three years only comes after. If a tool asks for a photo of someone, the tool is the red flag.

If what you want is explicit AI imagery, use the lane the law leaves open on purpose: a companion who doesn't exist. Design her yourself, generate any scene in the Studio, tap Undress on her photos. Everything stays between you and a woman who was never real. Curious how that works in practice? Your first companion and her first photo are free.